Wednesday, April 16, 2008

NLTB defends policy

NLTB defends policy

Tuesday, April 15, 2008 - www.fijitimes.com

THE Native Lands Trust Board has defended its policy on land leases where landowners need to apply for a title of their own land even after it is returned to them by their tenants.

NLTB manager northern Joreti Dakuwaqa said that any person who wished to lease any Native land, irrespective of whether they were landowners or not would have to lodge application using the standard forms together with other personal details.

"An expired lease cannot be transferred and as such we need to process a new lease altogether to the new lessee," Mr Dakuwaqa said.

His comment comes after the Taukei Cane Growers Association raised concern on why landowners have to apply for a lease on their own land if they wanted to use it for cultivation of cane.

They also blamed the NLTB for the high presence of idle land in the division as a result of such process.

Association president Adi Sivo Ravuwale said that such situation has discouraged landowners from cultivating land as most won't benefit from any cane payments because the land title has not been transferred to them despite the expiry of leases.

Mr Dakuwaqa said the process to transfer the title to landowners who want to farm cane on their land took approximately three months to process.

"It takes long only if certain requirements in our approval conditions are not met by the applicant," Mr Dakuwaqa said

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Serua chiefs discuss NLC request

Serua chiefs discuss NLC request
08 APR 2008- www.fijilive.com
Members of the chiefly Vunivalu clan of Serua are meeting in Navua to discuss a request by the Native Land Commission for the names of installed chiefs in the province.

Roko Tui Serua Vanalagi Vesikula says the request by NLC is in relation to new laws to have only installed chiefs as members of the Great Council of Chiefs.

Vesikula adds the commission has requested that the province provide information on installed and uninstalled chiefs.

The Vunivalu of Serua, Ratu Penaia Latianara, is the paramount chief of the province.

However, close to 20 chiefs in the province have either been installed or are yet to be anointed and this is a worry for the NLC.

Serua is the smallest province in Fiji with an estimated population of 5,000.

GCC taskforce chairman Ratu Josateki Nawalowalo says Serua has a good record of installed chiefs.

“This is because the province has a lot of natural resources like logging, fishing, exporting of spring water and chains of hotels,” he said.

“So if you are not an installed chief you don’t get lease money from all these benefits and that’s the reason provinces along the Coral Coast have so many installed chiefs.”

Ratu Josateki says one of the main requirements of the Interim Government is for chiefs to be installed in all provinces.

“At the moment 80 per cent of chiefs are not installed so it’s very hard to know who’s who nowadays,” he said.

Ralogaivau Forces Sister to Sign Letter

Chiefs action upsets sister

UNAISI RATUBALAVU
Tuesday, April 08, 2008

A MEMBER of the Great Council of Chiefs taskforce team is alleged to have forced family members to sign a letter to endorse him as head of their mataqali (clan) so he could be in the Great Council of Chiefs.

Adi Rasagavi Ralogaivau, the elder sister of Ratu Filimoni Ralogaivau said she was pestered by her brother at her home in Raiwaqa to sign the letter.

Ratu Filimoni is a member of the GCC taskforce four-member team. He said he did not know about the issue when he left for Bua at the weekend

Speaking in Fijian, Adi Rasagavi said her brother went to see her last week and told her to sign the letter. When she asked him what the letter was about, Ratu Filimoni told her he will be the head of their clan in Wainunu and needed Adi Rasagavi's signature.

She said he kept on telling her to sign the letter so he could be the head of the Muanaicake clan of Wainunu, Bua.

Adi Rasagavi and her sister, Vilomena Lewakulati went and complained to the Native Land Commission chairman on April 1, and was told to write a letter.

A copy of their letter of complaint obtained by The Fiji Times was addressed to the NLC chairman, Ratu Viliame Tagivetaua. The letter, dated April 2, was written in Fijian and explained how Adi Rasagavi and Mrs Lewakulati were forced by Ratu Filimoni to endorse him head of their clan. They also stated in the letter that they had withdrawn their signature because they felt it should have been discussed by the clan before they could sign anything.

The sisters said in their letter that they were tricked by their brother.

Another close family member who wants to remain anonymous said Adi Rasagavi was older than Ratu Filimoni.

"By right, Ratu Filimoni is third in line to the title, the eldest in the family is Adi Maria Irarerevaki who is in Australia.

"The second in line is Adi Rasagavi," the member said.

The family member said three people had signed the letter and has urged other family members not to do it because it was not right.

"It is immoral and unethical, Ratu Filimoni is just doing it to get into the GCC so he can get some money," the family member said.

Ratu Filimoni denied that he went around forcing his sisters to sign the letter last week.

He said he had no knowledge of the letter and did not want to comment any further. "I don't know anything about the letter," was all he said.

Ratu Viliame said his office had received the letter and they would investigate.

He said in such a circumstance, members of a clan should be consulted and should all agree on who should be their head of clan or chief before a formal letter is submitted to the NLC


Province asked if chiefs installed

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

THE Native Land Commission has written to a provincial council to clarify whether the province's chief has been installed or not.

Roko Tui Serua Vananalagi Vesikula said he would have to liaise with the Vunivalu of Serua Ratu Peni Latianara and his clan about the issue.

"It is a sensitive issue at the moment, I have been asked by NLC to submit a report on the chiefs who are installed, including their title.

"I can only give you details once I have done my findings," he said.

This follows the criteria set by the Great Council of Chiefs taskforce team, which states that only chiefs who are installed and recorded in the NLC records can be included in the new-look GCC.

GCC team taskforce team leader Ratu Josateki Nawalowalo said the criteria would push the provinces and districts to install and formalise the heads of their clan.

"Most of the chiefly titles have been vacant for some time and this criteria will ensure that the traditional titles are filled by the chiefs," Ratu Josateki said.

The GCC taskforce is scheduled to make a presentation to the Serua Provincial Council on Thursday at Navua.

Ratu Josateki said the team would only present to the council what the State had decided on the new-look GCC and ask for the 14 councils to submit three names of chiefs they think should represent them in the chiefs meeting.

He hopes the GCC will meet in June with the chairman and interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama.

The taskforce team will make their presentations in the Rewa and Tailevu provincial councils next week

Historical find : Deed of Cession paper discovered

Ancient manuscript to be moved to the capital

UNAISI RATUBALAVU
Wednesday, April 09, 2008

The original Deed of Cession taken at the Fiji Museum+ Enlarge this image

The original Deed of Cession taken at the Fiji Museum

A GOVERNMENT delegation will leave for Levuka next week to bring the Fijian version of the Deed of Cession to Suva to be kept at the National Archives.

Lomaiviti provincial administrator Jese Veibuli said the Information Ministry was finalising details of the tour and a small celebration would be held in the old capital.

"The government delegation will also present a traditional ceremony to the Tui Levuka before the document is brought to Suva," Mr Veibuli said.

The importance of the document was discovered last month after it had been hanging in the provincial administrator's office all these years.

Government Archivist Setareki Tale confirmed that the 134-year find.

He went to Levuka to prove the authenticity of the document and said the document was handwritten and a quill was used.

The document would be taken to Australia for further tests.

Meanwhile, Fijian Teachers Association president Tevita Koroi said they welcomed the discovery.

"The discovery is good for students to know the importance of Fiji's history and such discovery is a good thing for us and our future generation to know.

"It is also good for this generation. Many of us did not know there was a Fijian version of the Deed of Cession and was written for our chiefs at that time to understand.

"At that time, in 1874, our chiefs were illiterate and that was how Mr Wilkinson wrote the Fijian version for the chiefs' understanding," Mr Koroi said.

Rewa chief Ro Filipe Tuisawau said that in such discoveries, we should always be cautious until it was proven by scientists.

"The discovery of the Fijian version of the Deed of Cession needs to be treated with caution. It is good that a Fijian version is on hand but the normal verification process which normally applies must be put in motion to verify its authenticity. This means that not only must the paper and ink be analysed but also the handwriting.

"This type of analysis can also be done by qualified scientists who have the tools and experience to examine historical manuscripts," he said.

Historical find : Deed of Cession paper discovered

UNAISI RATUBALAVU-www.fijitimes.com
Tuesday, April 08, 2008

A historical document, the original copy of the Fijian version of the Deed of Cession, was found in Levuka last month by government officials.

Lomaiviti Provincial Administrator, Jese Veibuli said the Government Chief Archivist Setareki Tale who went to Levuka to inspect the document confirmed it as the original copy of the Deed of Cession.

Mr Veibuli said the historical document would be taken to Suva and kept at the National Archives.

"The document is written in Fijian, in a frame hanging here in my office," he said.

"An officer with the National Heritage saw it in the office and mentioned how important it was. It was written by one Wilkinson.

"The document is a Fijian version of the Deed of Cession, it states to the chiefs what they were signing," he said

He said it was written in 1874 for Fijian chiefs to understand what they were signing.

He said the Government Archivist was contacted and he proved the authenticity of the document.

Mr Tale yesterday confirmed the 134-year-old find. "The document was in a pretty good condition considering the time it was written," he said.

"It was handwritten and a quill was used to write the document.

"I don't know the kind of paper used." The document would be taken to Australia for further tests.

Interim Minister for Education and Heritage, Filipe Bole said he would comment later.

Historian, Tevita Nawadra said the discovery was a big thing for the people of Fiji.

"That is good news and I am looking forward to seeing that document," he said.

Mr Nawadra said David Wilkinson, the chief interpreter who translated the Deed of Cession in Fijian was the first chairman of the Native Lands Commission after Fiji became a colony.

"Mr Wilkinson, used to stay in Bua and was the secretary of Ramasima, one of the chiefs in Bua at that time," he said.

"The Colonial Government was looking for someone who was fluent in Fijian and our culture, so Mr Wilkinson became the first NLC chairman," Mr Nawadra said.

He said this was something special for the people of Fiji, especially the indigenous people with the current political turmoil facing Fijian institutions.

He proposed that a big celebration be staged to highlight the importance of such a document.

The Deed of Cession was signed on October 10, 1874 by 13 chiefs of Fiji and Sir Hercules George Robert Robinson, the British Government representative at Nasova in Levuka.

Ratu Epenisa Cakobau, a descendant of Ratu Seru Cakobau, one of the chiefs who signed the deed of cession, said he was eager to see the document.

"I would love to see the document and I would prefer to comment after I actually see," he said.

"I'm really happy that such a document has been found."

Tui Namosi, Ratu Suliano Matanitobua was delighted to hear the news, but preferred to comment after seeing the document.

Levuka mayor, George Gibson said he was thrilled about the discovery but at the same time sad because the document would be kept in Suva.

"I would have hoped that it remains here in Levuka, because the signing of the Deed of Cession was done in Levuka," he said. He was informed about the discovery last month and said such a document proved the history of Fiji in the pre and post colonial era.

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Tui Macuata urges chiefs to sit in the GCC and lead

Tui Macuata urges chiefs to sit in the GCC and lead

Friday, April 04, 2008 - www.fijitimes.com

A CHIEF has urged other chiefs to take the opportunity to sit in the next Great Council of Chiefs meeting so that democracy returns as soon as possible.

Tui Macuata Ratu Aisea Katonivere said chiefs should think of their people and better future for everyone.

"As chiefs we should think of our people and a better future for everyone.

"We want to move on and everyone wants democracy to be restored as soon as and if this is a doorway to it, then why not grab it?" he said.

Ratu Aisea however expressed reservations on the criteria that chiefs who are eligible to join the new look GCC should be installed first.

"For us in Macuata, this title I'm holding we don't go through the installation process, it just passed down to me after my father passed away.

As for the Tui Labasa title, she will be installed and I will be a key figure in that installation process," Ratu Aisea said from his village in Naduri yesterday.

He said not all chiefs were installed because different districts and provinces had their own customs.

GCC taskforce team leader Ratu Josateki Nawalowalo said his team was mindful of the issue and would consider the chiefs who didn't get traditionally installed.

"We will refer to the Native Land Commission records on who is the rightful chief in districts and provinces. I know in some places, the chiefly title is passed down through generations

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Cultural Understanding Vital

Need to understand cultures is vital says chief

Wednesday, April 02, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

Update: 10.59am TUI Macuata Ratu Aisea Katonivere yesterday told participants of a community based workshop there was a need to learn new ways of understanding people of many races, cultures and religions.

His comments come as participants at the Sustained Dailogue on Identity and Belongingness in Fiji workshop were encouraged to work towards finding a sense of belongingness and identity for the people of Fiji.

"We need to seriously survey the landscape of our mindsets and entrenches patterns of interaction from which we view ourselves as insiders and outsiders.

"Today, we can begin to recognise and acknowledge the challenges that threaten to blight our efforts of becoming a people and of building a common destiny," Ratu Aisea said.

He encouraged participants to use the seminar as a platform of bringing people together to build a better Fiji.

"This opportunity can be an opportunity for us to use to increase dialogue about issues related to identity and belongingness in Fiji.

"We readily accept ethnic separateness as normal part of our national life in a way that our mutual fears and distrust have become greater than the risks of forging real bonds of friendship, collaboration and unity," Ratu Aisea said.

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Cakaudrove Supports High Chief - Tui Cakau's Stand

People stand by Tui Cakau

Wednesday, April 02, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

THE province of Cakaudrove will not join the newly restructured Great Council of Chiefs because the interim regime has already said their paramount chief, the Tui Cakau, Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu is not an eligible member.

Speaking on behalf of Ratu Naiqama, provincial spokesman and matanivanua (traditional herald) Epeli Matata said if Ratu Naiqama could not become a member of the council, it was disrespectful for other chiefs in the province to become members.

"We will not join the GCC if our high chief Ratu Naiqama cannot join because that will be disrespectful to our chief.

"In fact, we have three representatives from the province to the GCC and Ratu Naiqama is a member so if he is not allowed to join by the regime, then there will be no other reps from the province," Mr Matata said.

He said for the 14 chiefs of the province, only three were traditionally installed, including Ratu Naiqama.

"In the province, out of the 14 chiefs of the 14 districts, only three are traditionally installed including the Tui Cakau Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu, Tui Vaturova Ratu Wilisoni Matakibau and Tui Nasavusavu Ratu Suliano Naulu," Mr Matata said.

"We will only join if the regime allows our high chief to become a member of the GCC."

Mr Matata said if the regime does not change its stand, the province would not be members of the council at all.

He said the new council would not have many members as a handful of chiefs had not been traditionally installed in Fiji.

"Who are the installed chiefs in Fiji, hardly any chiefs are installed traditionally so that will definitely affect the membership of the new GCC."

"But the province all know that whatever the Tui Cakau says will be followed and according to the interim regime's review of which he cannot be a member of the GCC, the other two installed chiefs will not join also.

"This is what we call "domo dua" which is one voice and that is the voice of Ratu Naiqama and if he cannot be a member then why should other chiefs in the province join," Mr Matata said.

He said the province has not changed its stand on the People's Charter in not recognising the initiative by the regime.

"In fact we waited for a team to arrive in our tikina meeting two weeks ago and no one came because if they had come, we will tell them straight that they were not welcome in the 14 villages of the district.

"We have not changed our stand on the Charter and will remain that way as our high chiefs has said so," Mr Matata said.


GCC under scrutiny

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

A CHIEF has labelled the new-look Great Council of Chiefs as meaningless because three paramount chiefs of three provinces would be ineligible to join.

Rewa chief Ro Filipe Tuisawau said the Roko Tui Dreketi, Tui Namosi and Tui Cakau would be ineligible to join the GCC because of the seven-year stand-down period "that was designed to exclude these three and any opposed to the interim regime".

"Which other chief from Rewa, Namosi and Cakaudrove will come in? It is just designed to divide and rule and to appoint a Vice President they already have in the sidelines. Their game plan is so obvious that even kids can see it," Ro Filipe said. He added that the new-look GCC would be a puppet for the interim Government and he urged Fijian chiefs to boycott the meeting.

Ro Filipe said the new criteria set for the new-look GCC had been forced upon the people without proper consultation.

He added that the move by the interim Government was contrary to most provisions of the United Nations Declaration on Indigenous Rights.


Province snubs GCC

SERAFINA SILAITOGA
Tuesday, April 01, 2008 - www.fijitimes.com

THE province of Cakaudrove will not join the restructured Great Council of Chiefs because the interim regime has already stated that their high chief, the Tui Cakau Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu, was not eligible to be a member.

Speaking on behalf of Ratu Naiqama, provincial spokesman and mata ni vanua Epeli Matata said that if Ratu Naiqama could not become a member of the GCC, then it was disrespectful for other chiefs in the province to join the council.

"We will not join the GCC if our high chief will not join because it will be disrespectful.

"In fact, we have three representatives from the province to the GCC and Ratu Naiqama is a member.

"So, if he is not allowed to join by the regime, then there will be no other rep from Cakaudrove province," Mr Matata said.

He said that for the 14 chiefs of Cakaudrove province, only three had been installed including Ratu Naiqama.

"The others are Tui Vaturova Ratu Wilisoni Matakibau and Tui Nasavusavu Ratu Suliano Naulu.

"We will only join the GCC if the interim regime allows our high chief to be a member."

Mr Matata said if the interim regime did not change its stand, then the province would not be members of the council at all.

He said the new council of chiefs would not have many members because a handful of chiefs have not been installed in their provinces.

"Who are the installed chiefs in Fiji? Hardly any chief has been installed traditionally so it will definitely affect the membership of the GCC.

"The whole of Cakaudrove province know that whatever the Tui Cakau says or wants will be followed and according to the interim regime's review that he cannot be a member of the GCC, the other installed chiefs will not join too.

"We call it domo dua which means one voice and which is the voice of Ratu Naiqama.

"If he cannot be a member of the GCC, then why should the other chiefs in the province join?"

Mr Matata said Cakaudrove province had not changed its stand on the People's Charter proposed by the interim regime.

"In fact, we had waited for a charter team to arrive in our tikina meeting two weeks ago but no one came.

"If they had come, we would have told them straight that they were not welcome in the 14 villages of Cakaudrove.

"We have not changed our stand on the charter and will remain that way as our high chief has said."

Two weeks ago, a group of villagers in Cakaudrove had stated that it was more important to obey their high chief than to acknowledge the proposed People's Charter.

Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Fiji doomed unless VP appointed: Chief

Fiji doomed unless VP appointed: Chief
31 MAR 2008 -www.fijilive.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Fijian chief believes the country could become a ‘crisis’ zone unless the position of Fiji Vice President is filled and the appointment of members of the Great Council of Chiefs done as soon as possible.

GCC taskforce chairman Ratu Josateki Nawalowalo told Fijilive it is imperative that members of the GCC are appointed soon otherwise the country is doomed.

“With all due respect, what if something goes wrong with the head of government and his position is left vacant?

“We will have no choice but to have the interim Prime Minister Voreqe Bainimarama take over his position because the VP and the GCC has not been appointed yet.

“That’s the reason we are trying to appoint the chiefs to sit in the council, but a few provinces have turned renegade on us. They don’t realize the consequences that will follow.”

Nawalowalo was referring to five provinces that have not shown support for the military-led interim Government and its initiatives.

He said that resentment of the interim Government will not get any better if the Prime Minister decides to become the head of government.

“So why don’t the chiefs and the people come aboard and support the interim Government and let life go on because if they continue to drag this then surely a crisis is imminent.

“It’s now or never and its time to make a wise choice for the people of Fiji.”

He is also pleading with the 14 Fijian provinces not to hesitate in appointing their high chiefs as their respective representatives to the GCC, so that the appointment of the VP is done.

“Our priority is to appoint the Vice President as soon as possible to fill the vacant position.”

He said the taskforce is confident that the new-look GCC will be ready to convene in two months.

“We are planning to hold the first meeting in June.”

Meanwhile the taskforce will be visiting the province of Serua next on April 10 to present to them the interim Cabinet’s decision on changes to the GCC.

The Naitasiri Provincial Council last week rejected the changes.

Monday, March 24, 2008

Villages stand by Tui Cakau

Villages stand by Tui Cakau

Monday, March 24, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

A group of villagers in the province of Cakaudrove says their allegiance lies with their paramount chief Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu and not with the interim regime.

The villagers of Koroivonu and Vuna, on Taveuni, believe their obedience to the Tui Cakau carries more than backing the People's Charter.

The comments from the villagers follows a split in the province over the Charter.

Some villages have agreed to work with Charter teams while others have banned them.

Ioane Paulo, an elder of Koroivonu, said it was not easy to go against the vanua, especially their paramount chief.

"We are living in rural areas or in the vanua so it is not easy and impossible for us to go against our chief's wishes," he said.

"If he does not support the Charter, we will not support it.

"It's important that we show him our respect and obedience because the vanua will look after the vanua.

"For us to disobey our chief is the most disrespectful thing a Fijian can do, it's just not right," Mr Paulo said.

Vuna Village headman Navitalai Qali said they supported Ratu Naiqama's stand not to accept the Charter and would not allow any committee to visit villages.

He said an elected government should carry out the exercise.

"We will abide by what our chief says and decides because we all want an elected government in power and such an initiative should be undertaken by an elected government," Mr Qali said.

The biggest district, Cakaudrove, which has 14 villages, has opted for the decision made by Ratu Naiqama not to allow or support any Charter teams to the villages.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Moce Sir Ian Thomson

Moce Turaga

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Sir Ian Thomson, who is being buried in Scotland today, was a proud Scot but a large part of his heart belonged to Fiji and especially the Fijian people. He commanded Fijian troops in the Solomons in World War II, was fluent in the Fijian language and would later spend a significant part of his career protecting Fijian interests on the Native Land Trust Board. He was a man who believed firmly in a multi-racial Fiji and dedicated himself to defending the interests of Fiji-Indian cane farmers as independent head of the sugar industry.When the annals of the decades leading to Fiji's independence and subsequently fall to be written, John Sutherland Thomson's contribution to nation building will feature prominently.

It is two decades since Sir Ian (as he was widely known) left these shores, and there is now a generation "which knew not Joseph" in the words of Exodus.

His death, aged 88, in Scotland on March 13, 2008, marks the end of cherished bonds of affection between Sir Ian and his adopted homeland spanning nearly 70 years.

Arriving in Fiji as a 21-year-old year old, Sir Ian was to spend most of the next 45 years in these islands.

Initially serving as aide de camp to the then Governor, Sir Harry Luke, Sir Ian saw action in the Solomon Islands campaign with Fijian soldiers as a commissioned officer.

There, he was decorated for bravery. It heralded the beginning of a close and intimate relationship with the Fijian people. One that was reciprocated in full measure.

After World War II, Sir Ian served in parts of Fiji in the District Administration.

He had strengthened his ties further to these islands by marrying Nancy Kearsley, a fourth generation member of a prominent local European family.

It was a union of kindred spirits and the bedrock of Sir Ian's life, together with a quiet Christian faith.

They were to have seven sons and one daughter, now scattered all over the globe who yet carry with them the vexing ambivalence of memories and reminiscences common in Fiji's diaspora.

As a district officer and eventually district commissioner, Sir Ian was closely involved with development in parts of the country.

Serving in Kadavu, Lomaiviti and Vanua Levu, Sir Ian had a rapport with the local communities.

His son Peter would follow in his stead. Fluent in Fijian with a smattering of Hindi, Sir Ian personified the best in the British colonial civil servant.

In manner and bearing he was princely, with an approachability that was as reassuring as it was genuine.

It was complemented by a voice that evoked dignity and gravitas.

Among Fijians, Sir Ian was said to embody 'nai vakarau vakaturaga', the chiefly manner asserted by so many yet practiced by only a few.

A critical part of Sir Ian's reputation for effectiveness, was the enduring friendships he had with Fijian leaders of the time.

Ratu Sir Lala, Ratu George Cokanauto, Ratu Josefa Lalabalavu and Ratu Tevita Uluilakeba, among others, as well as emerging successors like Ratu Mara, Ratu George Cakobau, Ratu Edward Cakobau and Ratu Penaia Ganilau, valued his counsel and companionship.

To Ratu Penaia in particular, he was like a brother.

Sir Ian was his best man when he married his first wife Laisa in 1947.

Many a convivial evening was spent with the Ganilaus at either their home in Suva or in 'Vuniduva' at Somosomo.

It would inevitably end with the singing of Scottish folksongs like Early One Morning and Loch Lomond.

Sir Ian's standing in the colonial administration and his Kearsley connections gave him ready entry into local European circles.

Part-Europeans like Fred Archibald counted among his friends. He was respected by the likes of Pandit Vishnu Deo, Pandit Ajodhya Prasad, Swami Rudrananda and Mr A D Patel for his sense of fairness and integrity. It was what struck people most about him.

On the death of Ratu Sir Lala in 1958, Sir Ian succeeded him as chairman of the Native Lands Commission.

It was a measure of his familiarity with things Fijian and the confidence reposed in him, both by the colonial administration and the Fijian chiefs, that he acceded to a position Ratu Sir Lala had made his own.

In this capacity, he continued and completed much of the records and detailing of boundaries his predecessor had embarked upon. It was all done in the understated style that was his modus operandi.

In the years immediately preceding independence, Sir Ian was Assistant Chief Secretary and acted as Chief Secretary on several occasions.

He contributed to the smooth transition to independence by encouraging dialogue, a message reinforced by the confidence he enjoyed among Fiji's political leaders.

In this process, he was the perfect foil for the Governor, Sir Derek Jakeway, who had a prickly relationship with Ratu Mara.

The untold story of his role in providing advice to Ratu Mara, Ratu Edward and Ratu Penaia may never be widely known, as the protagonists are no longer with us.

If Sir Ian was concerned about the sudden abolition of the Lawa i Taukei (or Native Regulations) in 1967, which gave Fijians galala or freedom overnight, he was too much of a gentleman to show askance.

His innate caution and tutelage under Ratu Sir Lala, would have inclined him to a more gradualist approach.

The irony must have struck him when he headed a Bose Levu Vakaturaga inquiry several years after 1987.

It considered how chiefs in general, and young chiefs in particular, might be given more training for national leadership.

Galala had accelerated the populist nature of the times.

It was difficult, if not impossible, to put the genie back in the bottle.

After a short period in the British Virgin Islands, Sir Ian returned to Fiji to be independent chairman of the Sugar industry.

He was to occupy the position for nearly a decade and a half.

These were the golden years of the sugar industry. Repositioning it in the wake of the departure of the Colonial Sugar Refining Company, the dynamism of Rasheed Ali and his colleagues at the Fiji Sugar Corporation, co-operation of the cane farming organisations, political stability provided by Ratu Mara's leadership and the wise stewardship of Sir Ian was a formula for success.

A critical element was his facility in dealing with all communities and the regard they had for him as an honest broker.

In this period, he served on other statutory entities as well. He was knighted for his record of public service in 1984.

In well deserved retirement, Sir Ian was able to spend more time with Lady Thomson.

However, her ill heath and deteriorating condition, obliged them to leave the country that had been his home for nearly half a century. Lady Thomson died two years later in 1988. Sir Ian's grief and loss can only be imagined, for he was a private person despite his public profile. Sir Ian subsequently remarried and the second Lady Thomson survives him.

In a very real sense, Sir Ian left this country at the right time. A year later, the cycle of coups began.

Although he would have understood Fijian insecurities, the British sense of justice and fairplay that was second nature would have caused Sir Ian profound hurt.

Peter, his son, was to become a casualty of the second coup in September, 1987.

Ratu Sir Penaia's poignantly piercing observation to the latter as he took his leave, about the divide between himself as 'an outsider' and the Fijian people, would have cut Sir Ian deeply.

It delineated the fault lines at the core of Fiji's ethnic realities, defying the enduring ties between them. But Sir Ian would never have dwelt on it given his generous nature.

True friendships bear all things, and the Fijian statesman was reflecting sentiments embedded deep in the Fijian psyche.

Sir Ian would have understood that and, recognising the love of one's country encompasses both the good and the difficult, he nevertheless continued to hold Fiji firmly in his heart to the end.


A fallen son of Fiji

Friday, March 21, 2008

Sir Ian Thomson+ Enlarge this image

Sir Ian Thomson

Sir Ian Thomson KBE CMG MBE(Mil) Sir John Sutherland Thomson KBE CMG MBE(Mil) distinguished colonial service administrator in Fiji over some 40 years from 1941, punctuated by a tour as Governor of the British Virgin Islands 1967-71, died in Edinburgh on 13th March, aged 88.

He was born in Glasgow on 8th January 1920, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with an MA (honours in economics) in June 1940.

Sir Ian, as he always chose to be known, was a dedicated colonial civil servant, wholly committed to Fiji and its people from the day he assumed duty in the colony as ADC to the Governor, Sir Harry Luke, in 1941 after a brief period of service in the Black Watch.

He formed very close links with the Fijians during his service as an officer with the 3rd Battalion of the Fiji Infantry Regiment on Bougainville, where he attained the rank of captain and adjutant and was awarded the MBE(Mil).

He greatly valued this experience which was the basis of his fluency in the Fijian language, and meant that wherever he went in Fiji later, he was almost sure to meet up with old comrades.

On his return to Fiji at the end of the war in the Solomon Islands, he married Nancy Kearsley, an event which was the beginning of a loyal, loving and fruitful partnership of 42 years. He served as District Officer in a number of areas, rising to become Commissioner Western.

He always remembered this experience, which meant he never lost the common touch when he rose into senior posts in the capital of Fiji. He and his wife kept open house for country officers and their wives when they visited Suva.

His links with the Fijian people were further strengthened by his years in the Native Lands and Fisheries Commission, the statutory authority which deals with Fijian Reserves. He was selected as deputy chairman by Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna, the outstanding Fijian of his day, and succeeded him as chairman.

He was ideal for the post with his knowledge of Fijian, his patience, and his transparent integrity, and he himself described this assignment as the most satisfactory work of his life. When he left this post, the Governor-General warmly commended his work as an outstanding and abiding contribution to Fiji and the Fijian people.

He was Colonial Secretary as Fiji was being prepared for independence. It was no secret that he rather reluctantly left Fiji to become Governor of the British Virgin Islands from 1967 to1971.

When he was invited by the new Fiji Prime Minister, Ratu Sir Kamisese Mara, to return to Fiji to chair the Sugar Industry Board he gladly accepted and held the post until 1985.

Once back in Fiji, his leadership qualities made him a prime candidate for the chairmanship of various other boards and committees including the Fiji Coconut Board and the Fiji Development Board. Notably amongst these appointments was the chair of Fiji's ailing airline Air Pacific, which he revitalised by negotiating an alliance with QANTAS, which is still operative.

He also acted as Governor-General on a number of occasions.

Meanwhile, he played a full part in the social life of the capital through Rotary and the YMCA, and his lifelong abiding faith was evidenced by his long service as an elder of St Andrews Presbyterian Church.

He retired to Scotland in 1986 and settled in his beloved Argyll near Oban. Sadly his wife Nancy died in 1988.

He later met up again with a childhood friend from his Glasgow days, Nancy Caldwell, and they were married and enjoyed seventeen happy years together, including frequent travels to visit families in all quarters of the globe. Latterly his wife had to undergo a serious operation. Nothing was too much for Ian in his care for her and it was one of life's ironies that very shortly after her discharge from hospital he should be the first to go.

Besides his widow, he leaves seven sons and a daughter, sixteen grandchildren and four great-grandchildren.

Friday, March 21, 2008

Vunivalu of Rewa- Ro Mataitini Passes Away

No mourning period for Rewa

Wednesday, April 02, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

THE people of Rewa will not observe a taboo period marking the death of the late Vunivalu, Ro Jone Mataitini.

A nephew of the late Vunivalu, Ro Alipate Mataitini, said only close members of the family, including the Vunivalu's widow, Bulou Amalaini Vale, his sisters and several nieces would observe the ritual, which entails wearing black and not cutting their hair until 100 nights after the funeral.

The late Vunivalu, a former Ombudsman and soldier at the Malaya campaign was buried at his village, in Lomanikoro last Wednesday.

The funeral was attended by the Roko Tui Dreketi, Ro Teimumu Kepa, interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama and relatives.

Province mourns chief
Last updated 3/27/2008 - www.fijitimes.com

The vanua of Rewa farewelled its Vunivalu Ro Jone Cure Mataitini yesterday.
The funeral service, which was held in Lomanikoro, Rewa, was attended by close relatives, diplomats and senior government officials including the interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama.
The passing away of Ro Mataitini has left the vanua of Rewa in mourning.
His nephew Ro Alipate Mataini said the people of Rewa would be observing a period of mourning.
It is not yet known when the next Vunivalu will be installed.
“It’s the vanua who decides on the installation of the next Vunivalu but at the moment the people want to observe a period of mourning,” he said.
Ro Jone passed away in his sleep on Tuesday last week. His wife Bulou Amalaini Vale was by his side.
Ro Jone was 81. He succeeded his late father, Ro Etuate Navakamocea Mataitini, as Vunivalu of Rewa 41 years ago and is survived by Bulou Amalaini, two sons Ro Jone and Ro Mocelutu, and two daughters Ro Unaisi and Ro Mereani, 13 grandchildren and ten great-grandchildren.
Ro Jone also has three surviving sisters, Ro Saunayalewa, Ro Litiana and Ro Qereitoga, and a brother Ro Epeli Mataitini.
He was a member of the Great Council of Chiefs, a former senator and member of the Fijian Affairs Board, the Rewa Provincial Council of which he was chairman, and various other statutory organisations.
He was also a former Ombudsman and an ex-serviceman.
Traditionally Ro Jone is the closest confidante, relative and advisor to the Roko Tui Dreketi, with whom he claimed traditional paramountcy in the province of Rewa.
As Vunivalu, Ro Jone was the bedrock upon which the people of Rewa found stability and to which the Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa and her predecessor Ro Lady Lala Mara could always rely on for support and advise.

A chief for the land and people is laid to rest

REIJELI KIKAU
Thursday, March 27, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

The Roko Tui Dreketi, Ro Teimumu Kepa, at the funeral yesterday.+ Enlarge this image

The Roko Tui Dreketi, Ro Teimumu Kepa, at the funeral yesterday.

THE late Vunivalu of Rewa, Ro Jone Mataitini, was a man who always had the vanua and the people at heart.

Delivering his eulogy at the funeral service at the Josaia Methodist Church at Lomanikoro in Rewa yesterday, his son and namesake Ro Jone Mataitini said that was something which his father would always be remembered by.

He said his father was someone who was always there for the people of Rewa and his advice and sound knowledge was something they would greatly miss.

Ex-Servicemen Association president Colonel Matereti Sarasau said Ro Jone was a respected member of the association who had served in the Malaya campaign.

He said that Ro Jone was a distinguished soldier and a chief who was hardworking and a very active member of the ex-soldiers association.

Yesterday, more than 500 close family members, relatives from chiefly households, friends and colleagues attended the funeral church service.

The church service was a combination of Methodist and Catholic denomination.

Methodist Church in Fiji Rewa division superintendent Reverend Kalivati Ravoka, who led the service, said they were farewelling a chief who was well known for his love for his people.

He was glad that the late chief had a yearning to learn more of the Lord and do his good will.

After the sermon from Mr Ravoka, Ro Jone was accorded a requiem mass celebrated by Father Sanele.

Hymns were sung by the Naililili Catholic Mission Church choir.

The funeral service was later moved to Wairua, the chiefly burial ground for the Vunivalu clan, where Ro Jone was laid to rest.

Delegates present at the service included the Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa, interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama, interim Defence Minister Ratu Epeli Ganilau, his wife Adi Ateca Ganilau and senior officers from the police and military.

Province prepares to farewell chief

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Dalo and pigs were piled up at Lomanikoro Village as people arrived to present their reguregu to the late Vunivalu of Rewa Ro Jone Mataitini yesterday+ Enlarge this image

Dalo and pigs were piled up at Lomanikoro Village as people arrived to present their reguregu to the late Vunivalu of Rewa Ro Jone Mataitini yesterday

THE late Vunivalu of Rewa Ro Jone Mataitini will be accorded a mixture of Methodist and Catholic church burial at the Josaia Methodist Church at Rewa Lomanikoro at 10am today.

Family spokesman Ro Aca Mataitini said his late grandfather's funeral service will include the two denominations because they were the first two to be received by the people of Rewa.

"We are expecting more than 1000 relatives from chiefly households from around the country, friends and the vanua at the burial today," he said.

He said interim Prime Minister Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama led a delegation on Monday morning to present their last respect to the family at the village.

Ro Aca said they Mr Bainimarama was accompanied by officers from the Fijian Affairs to pay their respect.

"The funeral gathering proper was supposed to start on Tuesday but close relatives and those closely linked to the family have been coming to pay their last respects since Saturday last week.

"This did not include those that came on Monday but since 10am on Tuesday morning there has been 44 delegations that have come to the village to pay their last respects," he said.

He said they had expected the Vanua o Lau, Na Vunivalu of Korolevu , Vanua o Rewa and other chiefly households closely linked to the family to pay their last respect yesterday.

Ro Aca said the warriors of Vutia Village were at the village yesterday morning ready to carry out their traditional duties once the body of the late Vunivalu arrived at the village

Former Ombudsman dies, 81

Thursday, March 20, 2008 - www.fijitimes.com

A high chief of Rewa and former Ombudsman has died.

The Vunivalu of Rewa and also a former senator Ro Jone Cure Mataitini (pictured) died in his sleep on Monday evening, with his wife, Bulou Amalaini Vale in attendance.

He was 81.

Ro Jone succeeded his late father, Ro Etuate Navakamocea Mataitini, as Vunivalu of Rewa 41 years ago and is survived by his wife, sons, Ro Jone and Ro Mocelutu, and daughters, Ro Unaisi and Ro Mereani, 13 grandchildren and 10 great-grandchildren.

Ro Jone was a member of the Great Council of Chiefs, and member of the Fijian Affairs Board, the Rewa Provincial Council of which he was chairman, and various other statutory organisations.

He is also an ex-serviceman of the Fiji Military Forces. The funeral will be held in Lomanikoro, Rewa.

Traditionally, the Vunivalu of Rewa is the closest confidante, relative and adviser to the Roko Tui Dreketi, with whom he claims traditional paramountcy in Rewa.

As Vunivalu, Ro Jone was the bedrock upon which the people of Rewa found stability, and to which the Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa and her predecessor Ro Lady Lala Mara could always rely on for support.

To the last, he never swayed from his loyalty to the Roko Tui Dreketi.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Chiefs agree to hold meeting

Chiefs agree to hold meeting
Last updated 3/19/2008 -www.sun.com.fj

The Bose ni Turaga would go ahead with a planned meeting despite being warned not to by the interim regime.
An executive committee met yesterday to further discuss the proposed Bose ni Turaga scheduled for April.
The proposed two-day meeting will be followed by the annual general meeting of the Viti Landowners and Resource Association.
VLRA spokesperson and Bose ni Turaga member Ratu Osea Gavidi said the meeting would go ahead as scheduled as agreed upon by all present at the executive meeting.
"We have decided at the meeting that we will go ahead with the planned Bose ni Turaga gathering," said Ratu Osea. He said the Bose ni Turaga being the governing body of the VLRA would have to be briefed on the first day about the progressive reports on the 20 resolutions arrived at in its meeting in February and March of 2006.
"The second and the third day will involve papers and discussions focusing on issues such as land utilisation and agriculture, indigenous land claims, mineral and oil explorations and so forth," said Ratu Osea.
He said in view of the unstable socio-political situation and the economic downturn since the military coup of December, 2006, papers and discussions would focus on how people could survive during these trying times keeping in mind the future of indigenous Fijians.
"The military has changed the legislation of the land by interfering with the Fijian Affairs Act which had also resulted in the removal of the Great Council of Chiefs,'' he said.
"This is why we have to meet in order to discuss about issues that concerns the people and they are trying to stop us from meeting."
He said the military was trying to dismantle the issues which the Bose ni Turaga would discuss.
Military commander Voreqe Bainimarama had earlier warned Ratu Osea to cancel the meeting and that the police would make sure it did not happen.

Land problems will remain despite more rent: Qarase
Last updated 3/19/2008 8:32:39 AM

The recent announcement by the interim regime on the increase in land rental is a good move, says ousted Prime Minister Laisenia Qarase.
He however warned it would not solve the land problem.
The Soqosoqo Duavata ni Lewenivanua party leader welcomes the announcement that rent on agricultural native land would increase to 10 per cent of the Unimproved Capital Value of land with a 4 per cent subsidy to be paid by government.
“It is a good move on the part of the interim regime however it will not solve the land problem or the problem of rent on agricultural native land unless the Agricultural Landlord and Tenants Act is amended,” Mr Qarase said.
He said that under ALTA, rent on agricultural land was fixed at up to 6 per cent of UCV.
“This means that rent actually charged can be anything from 1 per cent to 6 per cent. In effect this is what has been happening since ALTA came into effect in 1976 and 1977,” Mr Qarase said. He said several independent studies had revealed that landowners were receiving an average of only 2 to 3 per cent of UCV as annual rental income.
“This can be attributed directly to the clause in ALTA which allows negotiation in the determination of annual rent,” Mr Qarase said.
He said the SDL government had been pushing for a flat annual rent of 10 per cent of UCV and tenants who could not afford to pay this rent could put their cases to the Agricultural Tribunal for review.
“The ALTA Amendment Bill of 2005 presented to Parliament by the SDL government fixed the rent at a flat 10 per cent of UCV but this Bill was torpedoed by the Fiji Labour Party,” said Mr Qarase.
He said because actual rent levied had been running at 2 to 3 per cent of UCV, the 4 per cent subsidy by government would increase rental income to only 6 to 7 per cent of UCV and not 10 per cent of UCV.”The interim regime should explain this fact to landowners to avoid confusion and anger later on,'' he said.
“The 10 per cent of UCV rental income that has been widely publicised is likely to remain a dream for many landowners.” He said the rent subsidy decided by government was one of two options considered by the SDL government.
The second option was for government to take a head lease of all agricultural land and then issue sub-lease to individual tenants.
“But decisions on these two options should be conditional on appropriate amendments to ALTA,” Mr Qarase said. He said although ALTA appeared to have provided a solution to the land problem at the time (1976), the same law had now become a serious impediment to the development of agriculture in Fiji today.
“Unless and until ALTA is suitably amended to provide fairness and equity to both tenants and landowners the land problems will remain unresolved,” said Mr Qarase.

Friday, March 14, 2008

Land survey 'costly exercise'

Land survey 'costly exercise'

UNAISI RATUBALAVU - www.fijitimes.com
Thursday, March 13, 2008

A new survey of native land ownership proposed by the team investigating Fijian institutions will be a massive exercise, says Native Land Commission chairman Ratu Viliame Tagivetaua.

Ratu Viliame said another survey of native land ownership and boundaries (veitarogi vanua) would be costly.

He said that he had not been informed by his permanent secretary on the proposal by the team headed by Colonel Apakuki Kurusiga.

"As far as I know, there is no formal correspondence between our permanent secretary and myself on that team's proposal. But if the survey does take place, it will be a massive exercise," he said.

"They will travel the width and the depth of Fiji and collect all the information from the people."

Ratu Viliame also questioned why there was a need for a new survey when previous surveys from the 1820s to the last survey by Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna in the 1930s were correct.

"All the records of land boundaries and ownership are there and people were given time to query and make changes at that time. If the majority of the Fijian people agree with all the records here with us, why have another survey," Ratu Viliame said. Last week, one of the investigative team members assigned to investigate Fijian institutions, Kalivati Batibasaga, said the team hoped to carry out the survey once it was given the green light to investigate the NLC.

Mr Batibasaga said they submitted their proposal and budget of $1.3million to the Finance Ministry and were awaiting approval.

Rewa chief Ro Filipe Tuisawau said the basis of the review was erroneous.

"What it will do is cause uncertainty and instability because we will be questioning our current records," said Ro Filipe.

He said for the Rewa province, the survey was recorded and established in 1923.

He said a fresh survey would shake the foundations of Fijian society.

The Tui Cakau and the paramount chief of the Tovata confederacy, Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu, said the team needed to tread carefully with its proposal to carry out a survey.

"They need to tread carefully as it is a very sensitive area and they should do their homework well to see if they want to proceed with it or not," said Ratu Naiqama.

"I would be interested to see the parameters or their terms of reference regarding the NLC and whether they will look at the land issue or the social structure."

Tui Macuata Ratu Aisea Katonivere said his view was that the decision made by Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna had stood the test of time and had been the backbone of the vanua.

He said a fresh survey would be a huge exercise to undertake and urged the team to review its proposal

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Bau Links

Bau links still alive deep in the country

ROBERT MATAU
Monday, March 10, 2008 - www.fijilive.com

Kolinio Tubuna, right, of Nayavu Village in Wainibuka points to Navunikuluva, where the Vusaradave warriors once lived. On the left is Saula Matarau+ Enlarge this image

Kolinio Tubuna, right, of Nayavu Village in Wainibuka points to Navunikuluva, where the Vusaradave warriors once lived. On the left is Saula Matarau

FOR commuters along the Kings Road, Nayavu in the interior of Tailevu, is a beautiful village, large with modern home structures and to the passerby could well be a Government station.

But if you ask a bit more and sit down with the friendly villagers you will find it is a village deeply entrenched with the origins of some of the chiefly tribes of Bau Island - regarded as the traditional heads of the Kubuna confederacy.

I had passed the place often located in Wainibuka but did not know how deeply entrenched the links were until I was shown the foundation mound of a house or yavu makawa called Kubuna and Naua.

I had even pondered over the late Ratu Sir Lala Sukuna's sweeping statements on why Fijians should tread with caution when accepting modern concepts, likening the Fijian race to a bamboo on the Wainibuka River being swept down (by civilisation) and crushed on large boulders. He may just have been visiting his relatives in Nayavu while making that statement.

During the trip to Nayavu, I also discovered a place where the Vusaradave used to watch as the swift flowing Wainibuka River flowed, giving them the name Vu Sara Dave or watching the bowl (referring to the river below, the spot where an old village used to be).

The Vusaradave were known as the warrior clans of Bau and were renowned for their fighting prowess.

And who else to relate those tales but an ageing warrior of old from the village they call point of origin. The head of the mataqali Nubulevu of Nayavu (which means foundations in Fijian), Mitieli Turaga, 98, says he and his ancestors were the original elders of the Yavusa Bau and Yavusa Kubuna.

Pointing to a number of areas around the village area Mr Turaga, a World War II veteran and a former member of the Third Infantry Regiment (3FIR) who saw action in the Solomon Islands, says he is the head of the mataqali Nubulevu, who come under the Yavusa Bau.

"Our ancestors were closely related to the great Ratu Seru Cakobau, the Vunivalu of Bau and who also knew and cherished his connections with us," he said. "In those days our chiefs were God-fearing and much loved by the people and we enjoyed a cordial relationship with the people.

"As you will see the foundations of Kubuna and Bau are around this area and some households are named after some of the chiefly households on Bau like Naua (from which the Tagivakatini and Seniloli families come from)."

Mr Turaga said the Cakobau family from Ratu Seru's era and later on used to make frequent trips to the village.

"The name Nayavu means Yavu kei Bau. Our village used to be called Drekeniwai but then it was changed by Ratu Seru to Nayavu because of his links with our people."

Another Nayavu villager, Kolinio Tubuna said the old village was located on the opposite side of the river from the present village location.

"The elders were told to leave the place called Navunikuluva near the Irish crossing but they told those who were advising them to leave that they wanted to stay and watch the river down below which they referred to as a bowl and derived the name Vu sara dave to which they have links with the same clan on Bau by the name Vusaradave.

He said today the old site is surrounded by trees.

The old Kubuna village is located a few feet above this area on a hill.

And to cross check the authenticity of the story as Fijian legends can be disappointingly contradictory a senior member of one of the Bau clans confirmed the links and the fact that they were very much intact

Friday, February 29, 2008

Naitasiri vocal on land plan

Thursday, February 28, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

MEMBERS of one of the province of Naitsiri have been vocal about the land dereservation plan floated by Dr Krishnamurti.

A member who preferred to remain anonymous said there were questions raised by members who came in numbers to meet at the Tamavua Village community hall yesterday.

"There were questions raised and what the dereservation meant for those owning land," the source said.

The source said the landowners were concerned about their land with the latest announcement. When The Fiji Times visited the village yesterday, they were not allowed to sit in the meeting.

Present at the meeting was Naitasiri chief Ratu Inoke Takiveikata.

Last week, the province of Cakaudrove warned interim Finance Minister Mahendra Chaudhry to back off and not touch land issues.

Speaking on behalf of the Tui Cakau Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu and the people of Cakaudrove, Epeli Matata said Mr Chaudhry and the interim regime should not dereserve native land.
End of story

* Email to a friend

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Making the Right Choices

SITIVENI RABUKA
Sunday, February 24, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

The Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa, front, makes her way to the Great Council of Chiefs meeting held last year. WIll she be one of the chiefs disqualified from sitting on the new GCC + Enlarge this image

The Roko Tui Dreketi Ro Teimumu Kepa, front, makes her way to the Great Council of Chiefs meeting held last year. WIll she be one of the chiefs disqualified from sitting on the new GCC

NI sa bula. What a week! Still, it was a great week!

It was a great week because we now know one of the things that Frank believes will continue to build a better Fiji a good council of chiefs.

Before Cession, Ratu Cakobau at his chiefly home knew exactly who he needed to agree with him in his move to cede Fiji to Queen Victoria.

He asked them to support him on his understanding that these chiefs' word was law in their vanua, kingdoms, confederacies or alliances.

Ratu Cakobau had known of their prowess in battles, their powerful leadership of their subjects in social development and cohesiveness.

The result of his careful choice of the chiefs he wanted to sign the Deed of Cession with him is that the pacification of the rest of the chiefs was not as drawn out or as bloody as could have been, had he not scouted properly for whom to come to the signing table.

Such is the importance of having wisdom in the council of chiefs.

Frank has timed the changes well, by design or by accident to bring in the "qualifying" clause of who a chief is deemed to be.

We are lucky indeed, for if the "installed" clause had been brought in 50 years ago, many of the great national mission and vision deciders would not have qualified.

And if Frank had brought in the "legitimacy" question, we may have to repeal many of our statutes because many authors in the past would not have been qualified to rise to national leadership for being illegitimate. My favourite uncle once told me there are no illegitimate children only illegitimate parents who refuse to accept their responsibilities.

I quite agree with that, for why should we look at the absence of a participating father if the issue of his union with a willing mother becomes a successful man or woman.

Why should we disqualify someone just because he or she is illegitimate?

Well, we are all glad that this issue is not a "disqualifying" factor.

But what of their other "disqualifying" factors like previous service to the nation in Parliament, not being an "installed" chief, being an ex-con etc.

It would be interesting to hear the views of the champions of our constitution like Akuila Yabaki, Dakuvula, Barr and Mataca on whether these provisions in the new Fijian Affairs (Great Council of Chiefs) Regulations 2008, contravene certain parts of Section 38 of our 1997 Constitution.

While the new Commissioner of Prisons is doing his best to destroy the past image of prisons and prisoners and make inmates ready to be totally absorbed back into society on their release, it is rather incongruous that the new regulations will perpetuate the stigma but only at a certain level of the indigenous society.

While my cousin Peniela will be ready to come and live his full village life in Drekeniwai, my paramount chief (and properly installed one at that!) will not qualify to represent his subjects in the council that his erstwhile forefathers had taken almost for granted was God's calling on them to be members in.

Ioane took some high profile prisoners to their former work places where they shared morning tea with former and possibly future colleagues, to drive the point home that the law brought in by the SVT government on "spent conviction" is the way to go for this young and close-knit nation.

With these in mind, it is such a pity that the Fijians will be deprived of the services of some very highly qualified chiefs, two in particular one of whom has spent all her life teaching, counselling and serving others in her chosen career and in Parliament, and the other who had gracefully accepted the court's verdicts and served his time for his past.

Prior to that he had served the Fijian people in the Native Land Trust Board, accepted being made redundant by one of his own subjects from his province and served the nation in Parliament.

And, not many Fijians can boast a Harvard education!

With all these things happening, it is going to be interesting to see if the economy will grow, so it is very important to have someone who knows the tricks to be the catcher of tax dodgers and be the national official receiver, because it takes one to catch one!

Have a great Sunday and another great week

Macuata Catch Centre will Help People

Serafina Silaitoga
Monday, February 25, 2008-www.fijitimes.com

+ Enlarge this image

Times: Macuata has been identified as the province with the highest number of people who have moved elsewhere in search of a better life. As the paramount chief of the province what is your view of this?

Ratu Aisea: That is a fact and is a concern as people continue to move out of Macuata or the Northern Division because of the expiry of land leases.

This has happened since the political upheaval of 2000.

It is because of the lack of employment and study opportunities.

I believe that is why the interim Government has brought in the Northern Development Program, with an investment of $5million.

Most of the population in Macuata were descendants of the Girmitiyas, having cane farms in the province and with the expiry of land leases, they moved out of Macuata.

Times: So you believe the NDP will prevent or halt the vast majority of people moving out of Macuata.

Ratu Aisea: It will help by using the capital provided by the NDP to raise participation of the community in businesses at every level from micro to mega businesses.

This will help and increase development in not only Macuata but the Northern Division.

It will enhance and upgrade the livelihoods of the people as there will be capital available here.

Times: Apart from the NDP assistance, as the paramount chief, what else do you propose to do to change this?

Ratu Aisea: Yes, the chiefs are looking at other things we can do to help the people, one of which one is the qoliqoli where plans are under way to establish a market for fishermen where locals can sell their catch instead of struggling to find markets themselves. We will set up a centre where they can bring their catch to and we will sell it to markets in Viti Levu.

We are looking at a small business scale, like PAFCO, in Levuka, to stand at Naduri, and part of the funding we will apply for to the NDP.

Times: How much will this cost?

Ratu Aisea: We are looking at a quarter million dollars to start off the project for the people of Macuata.

This will be the initiative of the vanua to prevent the rural urban drift as it will create employment opportunities.

Times: When do you expect to open this centre?

Ratu Aisea: It's in phases and right now we are involved with the issuing of fishing licenses, which will close this Friday and the set up of the centre is the next phase of our plans.

Times: Do you feel that the lack of utilisation of resources by landowners and the people of Macuata over the past years has contributed to the slow pace of development in Labasa?

Ratu Aisea: I believe the improvement of the economy in the North lies with the people and even though resources can be a source of finance when marketed, the problem was with the technical side of it where mills are needed to produce furniture or there were limited markets for the products.

Like with honey, farmers have struggled to find markets, so I believe the problem was with the market and technical assistance because if these were available a decade ago, then Macuata would have been fully developed by now.

Times: Cane leases have expired, tenants have been displaced and yet it's an irony there is so much idle land around. What is your opinion on the members of your province who demanded land back but have done little or nothing to improve it?

Ratu Aisea: We are mobilising that right now by working with the Native Lands Trust Board to create and change the mindset of landowners to capitalise on their cane farms.

We are looking at the total involvement of landowners in the cane industry from leasing to farming to marketing instead of just receiving lease money.

We are working on landowner involvement in the production of ethanol and we believe landowners should be shareholders in whatever companies we will work with or set up to produce ethanol.

Times: What do you think of the suggestion by an Indian consultant to dereserve reserved land?

Ratu Aisea: I believe that not all reserved land are to be derserved but the reserved land that is not being cultivated or made use of.

However, a very good consultation and negotiation is to be done with the landowners where the sugar industry can be allowed to use only small areas of reserved land where landowners will benefit greatly.

But not all reserved land is to be used because it is part of us passed down from our forefathers and should be kept aside for our future generation for their own use.

Times: Are there any plans by chiefs to discuss with their people renewal of land leases because basically this town is suffering economically because of the land problems?

Ratu Aisea: We are working with the NLTB and our people talking to them about getting involved with cane farming themselves.

So it will be a different approach altogether as the landowners will have another option to cultivate their own land and not necessarily renew their leases, which they will decide themselves

Only meaningful dialogue will resolve our land problems

Monday, February 25, 2008-www.fijitimes.com


The issue of land has reared its contentious head again on the local political scene.

And again (in contemporary times) it is Mahendra Chaudhry who has brought it up.

And again, as would have been expected, there is a cacophony of reactions from all around the overwhelming majority being negative.

This article attempts to discuss, in one piece, some of the main issues surrounding the land question in Fiji. Release land

The rationale in support of releasing (de-reserving) land for productive use is largely economic based.

Over 90 per cent of land in Fiji is native owned.

There is little arguing that the bulk of land taken back through non-renewal of sugar leases went to fodder; this trend continues.

Another 50,080 hectares moved from Crown Schedule A&B in 2002 have not made any visible difference to the economic plight of the i taukei.

The socio-economic ramifications of this are only too visible for the caring urban overflow, over-crowded dwellings, burgeoning squatter settlements, juvenile delinquency, lack of respect for order and authority, rampant crime, prisons bursting at the seams, etc.

It, therefore, becomes imperative on any government to address these largely (though not exclusively) Fijian problems.

And the main strength lies in getting the Fijians to make better economic use of their main asset land.

This can be done either directly by engaging in commercial agriculture or indirectly by leasing out land to the willing, ethnicity notwithstanding.

One sure way of implementing this is to de-reserve idle land and make it available on lease to both Fijians and other communities.

This would not only give the new Fijian lessees an economic asset for hassle-free loan collateral, but it would give the non-Fijian lessee security of tenure.

A win-win for all provided the infrastructure is in place and there is no shortage of land for traditional taukei usage. The mover

The above rationale calls for careful consideration, but in the Fijian psyche it does not reach the stage of being granted even a hearing because the mover is Mr Chaudhry a person reviled and distrusted by the bulk of the Fijians.

The demonisation process that galvanised part of the support for the 2000 coup left an after-effect that was never totally erased.

Then Mr Chaudhry's public skirmishes with Professor Baba, Poseci Bune, etc. followed by his speedy support of the 2006 coup and characteristic subsequent disregard for the niceties of public relations have not helped his public image among the wider population.

His commissioning of the publicly controversial Krishnamurthi report (regardless of the explanatory play with words that have accompanied it) have further stoked the flames of suspicion.

Mr Chaudhry, therefore, should have been the last man to spearhead the latest land move.

Unfortunately, he took it unto himself to attempt to help the country regardless of how unsound his self-counsel may have been.

This calls for a closer look at the support structure that has propelled Chaudhry to the fore on this highly significant issue.The support structure

The 2006 coup brought Mr Chaudhry back into government and into a portfolio that many (including yours truly) thought should have been his in Laisenia Qarase's multi-party Cabinet.

Mr Chaudhry was said to have joined the interim Cabinet after carefully considering the invitation from Commodore Voreqe Bainimarama.

There was a large group of people who disliked the coup, but expected some good to come out of it because of arrogant, wasteful and exclusionist trends seen under Mr Qarase's reign.

What the interim regime forgot was that it had to keep an eye on the public relations aspects of its run in power.

Sure they were doing hard work under extremely trying circumstances with obstructionist reactions from traditional economic partners.

The fact remained that they could not afford to alienate the very people that they were supposed to be working for.

Therein lies the weakness of the support structure behind Mr Chaudhry's latest land move.

The very people who own the land have had the pinnacle of their tradition being besieged by the interim PM while Mr Chaudhry has commissioned a covert land report.

The faith, trust and goodwill, that was the cornerstone of the relationship between the Crown and the Fijian people in 1940, is marked by its clamourous absence at this juncture.Keep the land

That lack of positive inclination aside, the Fijian sees his land as an extension of his being he is of the land and the land is part of his identity, something that provides meaning to his existence.

He does not see it as a commodity or property in the Western sense.

This is where the first point of conflict arises in discourse on land in Fiji.

The term i taukei is linked to the qele; this usually takes the form i taukei ni qele meaning the custodians of the land.

This is different from "owners of the land" as understood in the Western sense.

It has wider generational, ownership and responsibility implications.

Thus if the i taukei feels that he is being overlooked or ignored on matters pertaining to the qele he will instinctively become negative and disinclined.

I do not wish to labour this point here as there are those who are better qualified for that.

Suffice to say that land is not an issue to be treated as a matter of fast convenience in Fiji.

There are established lines of communication and protocol to be followed.

This might appear time consuming and obstructive, but it is essential for the consensus necessary for any lasting policy to emerge. The fallout

One would wish that land would not hold such a premium both from the economic as well as socio-political perspectives seen above.

Unfortunately that is the reality of life in Fiji (as in many other economies).

Fijian land was made available to colonial Britain as well as the Colonial Sugar Refinery Company.

It continued to be made available to SPSM and then the Fiji Sugar Corporation and other stakeholders.

This is where sugar politics a continuing struggle against a hostile company and government has its roots.

When ALTA leases started expiring in the late 1990s, there was a call from the landowners for a renegotiation of rents so that renewals could be granted.

This became a major political issue that all concerned tried to capitalise on.

There were issues and contingencies that never saw the light of day.

Much was made of the material progress of the cane farmers with little appreciation of the virtually Calvinistic principles of hard work and thrift that led to that progress.

This issue was thumpingly raised at a panel discussion by a Fijian professor who said "we are not fools".

Later I wrote to him in private pointing out the differences in attitude towards investment and consumption.

He never replied even though we remain friends.

The continuing land saga in Fiji is a result of that inability to engage in meaningful, concerned and constructive dialogue.

And at the centre of that was none other than the controversial Chaudhry. n The opinions contained here are those of the author and not necessarily shared by his employer, the University of the South Pacific, or any other organisation local and foreign that he may be associated with

Sunday, February 24, 2008

GCC Membership Change Makes No Sense

OPINION -www.fijidailypost.com


To Be or Not To Be - 23-Feb-2008

THE past week has been a political revelation and an awakening call for the general public, particularly the indigenous Fijian community.

Likewise, a major portion of the Indian community as well as the minority groupings are wary of the revelations because they are aware that their future prosperity in this country is pegged along with that of the indigenous Fijian basket. You may ask what the hell is this idiot talking about? Or who is this novice or neophyte to come and express an opinion on political issues affecting Fiji at the moment?

Yes, of course, you are quite right to question my qualification or my integrity to express a political opinion. I don’t mind being called names, being sworn at, vilified, or even castigated, but I reserve my rights under the Constitution to express an opinion freely without fear of being arrested or intimidated.

Anyway you don’t have to be Einstein to notice that all is not rosy in Fiji at the moment. All that glitters, no matter how shiny some of us polish it, is not gold. You would have to be blind Freddie not to see that what is on display in some quarters is, in fact, a shiny papyrus commonly known to some as ‘fools gold’.

Anyway, as pointed out earlier on, political manifestations this week have indeed been a revelation.

First, there was the infamous proposal by an Indian national expert on Sugar, Dr Krishnamurthi, recommending that all reserved native lands should be de-reserved, to rehabilitate the ailing sugar industry.

The idea is for these de-reserved parcels of 40 to 400 hectares of land to be leased to individual farmers or companies for commercial farming.

The Dr Krishnamurthi report was commissioned by the Minister of Finance Mahendra Chaudhry. The report is now with the Native Land Trust Board, as custodian of native lands, for consideration.

The outcry against the proposal, understandably, from landowners, has been overwhelming. The cry is: why should native landowners sacrifice their resources to enhance the economic sustainability of tenant farmers and the political convenience of their political masters?

In fact, judging by the wholesale condemnation of Dr Krishnamurthi and his report, I believe the good doctor should be thankful that we are now living in the new millennium and that indigenous landowners have embraced Christianity. Otherwise he could be lovo meat by now.

A few days after the Murti mayhem, another revelation came to light.

This time, interim Prime Minister Frank Bainimarama issued via government gazette dated February 13, the Fijian Affairs (Great Council of Chiefs) Regulations 2008.

First and foremost, through these newly published Regulations, Bainimarama revoked the Fijian Affairs (Great Council of Chiefs) Regulations 1993.

This move is unprecedented. Bainimarama’s action has been viewed with awe and trepidation. Why? Because there is a case challenging the legality of the original dissolution of the GCC which was undertaken in 2007 by the former interim Fijian Affairs Minister, Ratu Epeli Ganilau. That case is still pending in court.

I refer more specifically here to the challenge by sacked chairman of the GCC, Ratu Ovini Bokini, and former GCC members, the Ka Levu of Nadroga, Ratu Sakiusa Makutu, and Kubuna Chief, Ratu Epenisa Cakobau.

The case has been called several times in the High Court. It is now set for hearing in March.

One would have thought that it would be prudent on the part of the Interim Government to shelve their proposed restructure of the GCC until the High Court had made a ruling on the legality of the dissolution challenge.

It would certainly make sense, indicating mature and responsible leadership.

But lo and behold, the Interim Government has thought otherwise and gone ahead with the restructure process.

What can be deduced from such bold and deliberate action?

Well, what can we say except that the action seems to be but a true reflection of the mediocre legal, political and traditional advice emanating from his chief legal officers. Or perhaps from one officer in particular, Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum? There appears to be no regard whatsoever with due process of the law.

From the point of view of a layman like me, it appears that Sayed-Kaiyum is advising Bainimarama according to what Bainimarama wants to hear and not what he should be told. Circumventing the law appears to be a daily exercise as long as it adheres to the whims of the coup makers. Is this action a case of contempt of court, I wonder?

Such is the desperation by the Interim Government to stamp its authority, that it is forced to deliberately turn a blind eye to the law in the mistaken belief that the unsuspecting Joe Blow down the road will not notice what it is up to. There is a Fijian expression which described this eloquently; me dina ga a dai- literally translated “let the lies be truths”.

What has happened to the universally accepted and recognised norm that aggrieved persons have a right to be heard in a court of law? I suppose if we are in a dictatorship there is no such accepted norm. Yet we are presumably still living in a constitutional and legally based democracy.

Anyway, the Fijian Affairs (Great Council of Chiefs) Regulations 2008 is a document whose provisions are shot through with confusion and muddled thinking of the kind that could lead to mayhem and chaos if adopted. Certain provisions overlap with each other while some even seem to contradict each other.

The GCC 2008 Regulations spell out in detail what class of chiefs are eligible for membership, how members can be disqualified, its functions and duties, how often the GCC should meet and its Secretariat.

Reading through its provisions, I cannot help but believe that the Interim Government is “obsessed” with dismantling the age-old Fijian system of government, which, for over a century, has been the pillar of the indigenous Fijian society. The whole interim Cabinet appears to be infatuated and preoccupied with this obsession.

They are passionate and in many ways fanatical about “clipping the wings” of Fijian leadership. If they are allowed to carry on unchecked, the Fijian bird of paradise will soon fall to the ground in a splatter, unable to soar high into the sky as all its feathers will have been systematically and unceremoniously plucked off by these fixated political explorers.

The new-look GCC will have 45 members comprising 3 chiefs from each of the 14 provinces and 3 chiefs from Rotuma. And there shall be 6 co-opted members. The 45 chiefs and the 6 co-opted members will all be appointed by the Minister for Indigenous and Multi-Ethnic Affairs. In this case, the interim Prime Minister, Bainimarama.

The interesting question here is, who among the chiefs is chiefly enough to be regarded as a chief and qualifies to be a member of the GCC representing their province? In other words, who is a chief and who is not? We can take it a step further to determine who the real chief is and who is the ‘thief’ (those claiming the title for traditional and political expediency and convenience)?

If that is not enough, the Regulations stipulate qualifications that would automatically deprive real chiefs from representing their people in the GCC.

A good example is the case of the Turaga Tui Cakau, Ratu Naiqama Lalabalavu. It is public knowledge that Ratu Naiqama is the paramount chief (Turaga-I-Taukei) of the Vanua of Cakaudrove. He has a number of traditional sub-chiefs (if I am allowed to describe them as such for the sake of clarity), who owe allegiance to Ratu Naiqama as Tui Cakau.

Ratu Naiqama has already been installed as the Turaga Tui Cakau by the people of Cakaudrove as their paramount chief.

But under the new regulations, Ratu Naiqama would not qualify as a member of the GCC because the high chief was a minister in the deposed Qarase government - thus has not fulfilled the seven-year stand down period subscribed under the 2008 GCC Regulations.

And not only that, Ratu Naiqama would be disqualified on the grounds that he served time as a prisoner after he was convicted for the role he played in the takeover of the military camp at Labasa during the 2000 coup.

A closer look at Ratu Naiqama’s case reveals a clear case of outright discrimination. I mean Ratu Naiqama had served his time and paid the price for using his chiefly status (rightly or wrongly) in his pursuit to maintain calm and peace during the mutiny in Labasa then.

His stint in parliament as a politician and as a government minister, like his installation as Tui Cakau was through the will of his people. To deprive him of representing his people in the GCC is to rob his people of their right to determine who is to be their chief and who is to represent them in the GCC. Why should he be discriminated against because his subjects want him to represent them?

The interim regime should not let itself be put in a position where it could be accused of taking out a personal vendetta against people like Ratu Naiqama – and others who seem to be viewed as enemies because such people do not subscribe to the government’s line.

Under the new 2008 GCC Regulations, three chiefs would be appointed by interim PM Bainimarama, after, I suppose, consulting the Cakaudrove Provincial Council.

Indigenous Fijian protocol demands that one of the three chiefs representing Cakaudrove would automatically be Ratu Naiqama in his capacity as Tui Cakau. The other two will have to be by choice provided (according to the new regulations) they have been traditionally installed and recorded as such in the Registrar of Native Lands.

What a disaster. I can now visualise the tension, struggle, emotion, division and even hatred erupting as those endowed with “blue blood” try to out-manoeuvre each other so they could win favour to be installed. Chiefly brothers will quarrel among themselves with the expectant rush among chiefs (even minor ones) to be installed hoping they would be appointed as members of the GCC.

This is what I meant when I said we will now witness who is the real chief and who is the ‘thief’ among our own blood lines. Chaos within the chiefly system and the vanua will be the order of the day. And what better recipe to divide the Fijian society than to encourage a battle royal among the ‘blue bloods’ of Fijian society under the membership clause of the GCC 2008 regulations.

I am reminded here of my late friend Taniela Veitata (God rest his soul), insisting that we refer to him as Ratu Taniela Ratu Veitata - epitomising that he is among the highest chiefs in Fiji. How and why? Well, simply because, he claims to be the only man in Fiji with a double Ratu.

He theorised that by self-imposing a double “ratu” in his name, he has qualified him to be among the ‘blue bloods’ of Fiji. We had a good laugh about it at that time. In fact, it became a household joke among our group. But wait a minute, it now appears that Ratu Taniela Ratu Veitata has had the last laugh after all – thanks to the drafting skills of the Regulations 2008 legal team.

So I ask, in all sincerity, is this what the Interim Government wants - the total weakening of the traditional Fijian system of life in order to impose another brand of authority?

Anyway, the GCC 2008 Regulations is a flawed document because it is totally inconsistent with the undertaking the Interim Government made in 2007 with the European Union (EU) on the roadmap to democracy that was to start with the March 2009 General Election.

But, among other things, how can the total independence of the GCC be maintained? With Bainimarama as new chairman of the GCC, the appointing authority and the decisions reached by the GCC are to be scrutinised by Cabinet which will be chaired by Bainimarama as interim PM, the independence of the GCC will be but a myth. It will be highly politicised.

Then there is the provision where members of the GCC are required to swear an oath of allegiance to the President after their appointment. This is again flawed and muddled thinking. The President, under the Constitution, is appointed by the GCC. How then can GCC members swear an oath of allegiance to the President if they are also empowered to remove him from office?

Well, as for me, I’d rather remain a ‘thief’ than have ‘blue blood’ and be called a chief. However, I can always be a self-imposed chief with three “ratus”- one better than my friend Ratu Taniela Ratu Veitata.

Until next week, happy reading.

Misipolo

Saturday, February 23, 2008

Lawyer questions Bainimarama’s authority

22 FEB 2008 -www.fijilive.com
Suva lawyer Savenaca Komaisavai says Indigenous Affairs Minister Voreqe Bainimarama is a commoner and has no authority to appoint himself to chair the Great Council of Chiefs.

He maintained Bainimarama’s appointment was “wrong and illegal”.

“For the position of GCC chairman, nomination comes through the office of the President. I don’t see any authority for Frank nominating himself,” Komaisavai said.

He questioned Bainimarama’s motive behind these moves.

“What has the Fijian nation and its people done to be treated this way in such a vicious manner when all their institutions they hold here have been attacked like this.”

Komaisavai and Lautoka lawyer Kitione Vuataki are representing a group of chiefs that were suspended from the GCC following the December, 2006 coup.

They will also be filing for a judicial review next week against Bainimarama’s “illegal” appointment.

“Who is he trying to hoodwink here? We have laws in this country to follow. You don’t just go and nominate yourself, especially a commoner like him,” Komaisavai told reporters at the Suva court.

“What standing does he have to go and elevate himself? He is asking for trouble.

“As a Fijian, that’s wrong and it is a very stupid decision. A politician of high standing, a Prime Minister would not stoop that low to treat Fijians that way. I would have hoped he would have done something wiser than that, stay out of it.

“Since he’s gone down that road, I’m coming too for him and we will meet somewhere at the junction down that road. And let me tell Frank, there’s only one guy standing after that, that’ll be me.”

Komaisavai said the independence and the integrity of Fiji’s judiciary was intact, “which is why we have come for help, for relief on behalf of the Fijian people to the High Court”.

He said the people of Fiji deserved better because the President’s office was not only for Fijians but “for our Indian brothers and sisters as well”.

“You can’t take that away. You must not. It must never happen,” he said.

Bainimarama returned from India today. He will hold a press conference on Sunday where he is expected to react strongly to criticisms leveled against him following the gazetting of a new regulation for a yet to be appointed new-look GCC.

According to the new law, the paramount chiefs of Fiji’s three traditional Fijian political divisions will not qualify to join the GCC.

Only traditionally installed chiefs can be part of the GCC and those who have not delved in politics in the last seven years.

In 2006, Bainimarama seriously challenged the highly revered institution when he suggested that its members then, “go drink brew under a mango tree”.